![]() i also like being able to have a set of prints mailed directly to a friend's house. I never would have gone outside to run an errand for some pictures. It was raining cats and dogs last month and I uploaded an entire set from the computer while it stormed. One thing I do like about online processing is the convenience. You probably are right that a PRO shop would do the job well, but I'm not sure we have one in New Orleans where I live that is really set up with the experience to do the job. I simply assumed others were making adjustments too. They also print much darker than I'd like, so I reset the gamma on my Mac to a darker curve so that my eyes would be tricked into seeing what Ofoto processing would result in. You're exactly right, lesh tones are really quirky. I've had good service from Ofoto, but I found out how to compensate in PSE for their autocorrection routine. Lots of information and anecdotal experiences with great observations. ![]() When the thread disappeared to the second or third page, I thought it was dead and went to some other online activity for a while.Īnyway, your post was MOST helpful. Like I apologized to Linda, I'm sorry for the late response. That price is incredible-less than half of any other service-so I'll be trying them soon. I use Color Services in Santa Barbara.)Īlso, I just noticed that my local Costco is offering prints from digital files (compact flash, SM, and CD) for only $.20 a piece. But a REAL pro lab will give you stunning results. (I'm not talking about a Wolf or Coyote lab-these have been unreliable. I'd highly recommend checking into local high-end labs too. Their prices are competative and you don't have to pay shipping. They accept all forms of digital media (zip disks, CDs, memory sticks, etc.), and now have an online drop box as well. The best results I've gotten have come from a local pro lab that has a Fuji Frontier printer. I like Ofoto's interface, and their free software, but this alone keeps me from ordering prints from them (and ImageStation, who uses them) regularly. Shutterfly is another larger photo processing site similar to Ofoto that offers the option to disable color correction. PhotoAccess, EzPrints, and Printroom all do a better job of reproducing accurate color. Also, I've found that their color correction tends to produce very unnatural skin tones. Ofoto assumes it can improve the output if they color-correct, but this means that any work you do to the image, in PhotoShop for instance, can be negated. Most other services offer the option of turning this feature "off" when ordering prints. I avoid Ofoto, since while the quality of their prints is great, they utilize an automatic color-correction process that cannot be disabled. Ofoto is popular, but another STF member was helpful in the past explaining why I get mixed results with them. Worth doing if you have the time-cost is typically not an issue, since most services offer a certain number of free prints upon initial sign-up. To test online services, I sent the same image to 5 or 6 different sites, so that I could compare the prints from each. I've tried a number of online and local services, with some interesting results. ![]() I posted something similar a few weeks ago on another thread. I completely agree with their analysis-they descibed Ofoto's results perfectly. I've been surprised more reviews like this haven't been done, as there are some pretty significant differences between online print services. Glad to see Macworld did this comparison. AnyoneĬompared these two particularly? Other recommendations or comments? I've uploaded some test images to Shutterfly to compare. Lacked red, resulting in a cyan cast that produced unappealing, Tonal ranges in other parts of the photos Prepping photos, placing orders, and print quality.Īlthough PhtoWorks walked away with the worst reward, the reviewersĬoncluded about Ofoto, "the Ofoto-printed photos were among the Photo, dotPhoto, eFrames, ImageStation, iPhoto, Kodak PictureĬenter Online, Ofoto, PhotoAccess, PhotoCenter, PhotoWorks, Pixels Into Prints," comparing 12 online photo services: Club Poorly in the recent review in the June issue of Macworld, "Turn I've used Ofoto for a while now, but the online service faired I'm interested in hearing what others have to say, too. They have graciously agreed to reprint those images again, so I'll see what the new batch looks like. I later found out that they use an auto color correction process that I should have disabled upon ordering. They were crisp, however, they had a yellowish cast to them. I didn't do ofoto because I've read they are geared more towards mac colors and also they have a color correction process that cannot be disabled (someone correct me if I'm wrong). I'm short on time right now, but I will post more later about a personal comparison test I did between shutterfly, ezprints, photoaccess and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |